|
The entire book is well documented with clear notes.
High point: the way it takes the Bible seriously.
Low point: repealed claims that academics are automati-cally
wiser than other people.
Though Christians seem to divorce and remarry at roughly the same
rate as everyone else, it is still a contentious issue for many
churches, and leads to a good deal of pastoral anxiety and personal
heartache. David lnstone-Brewer (a Cambridge PhD, as he never stops
reminding us) has experience as a minister as well as being a
theological researcher, and proposes some practical recommendations
that he also believes to be Biblical.
His book is certainly an interesting read, written in a
conversational style, which makes his complex arguments easy to
grasp. As you might expect, he starts with the Old Testament
teaching on marriage and divorce, before turning to the teaching of
Jesus and Paul. Inevitably, some bits are more interesting than
others: I personally found the chapter entitled "God the Reluctant
Divorcee" a bit far-fetched, but no doubt others would .see its
relevance right away.
The one thing that can he said without hesitation is that the
entire hook is well documented with clear notes as to where he gets
his ideas from and why the Bible means what he thinks it does. In
fact, the author has already written a much larger academic tome
which provides even more detailed textual and historical data, so
there is a further back-up for those who might have questions. The
provision of hard evidence is certainly important for his case,
because his claim is that every interpreter from the second century
onwards has misun-derstood the Bible's teaching, and he has now
unearthed new facts that will set the record straight once and for
all. The new information consists of a handful of documents from the
New Testament period that shed fresh light on the Jewish divorce
practices of that time, together with reinterpretations of the
Hebrew scriptures in the light of them. The actual evidence is too
complex to review here in any detail, but David Instone-Brewer
contends that in the Jewish context where Jesus and Paul operated,
divorce was allowed for pretty much anything (he thinks 'Any Cause'
in Matthew 19:3 was a technical legal term) and that both of them
were seeking to regulate this (and remarriage) rather than ban it
altogether. The practical outcome is that Christians today should
regard marriage as a lifelong contract based on specific vows, but
if one partner breaks one of them then the other can decide to end
the marriage - in which case they are free to remarry. Separation is
only allowed as a preliminary to divorce, and those who remarry in
church should have a 'service of repentance'. No-one will doubt that
we should under-stand the Bible's teaching in the light of the
circumstances of its day, nor want to ignore those new discoveries
that are enhancing our understanding of its background. But both the
strengths and weaknesses of this book are summed up in its
insistence that 'we should always follow the Bible even when it
seems difficult' (p175) - for what, exactly, does it mean to 'follow
the Bible': That is the key issue: not so much 'what does the Bible
say'? (though that is clearly important) but rather 'how do we use
the Bible?' The book recog-nises the need to contextualize the
Bible's message, but doesn't really get to grips with how to do it,
It is relatively easy to understand what Jesus and Paul were saying
in their own day, but quite another matter to show it applies to the
completely different circumstances of Western culture in the 21st
century - not to mention the diverse cultural assumptions of
different ethnic groups (which are largely ignored here). So while
some readers will find much to argue with here, others will simply
wonder what all the fuss is about. Whichever one you are, you will
certainly benefit from reading and reflecting, on it.
Professor John Drane teaches Practical Theology at the University
of Aberdeen.
|
|