Few topics create as much pastoral counseling anxiety as that of
divorce and remarriage. Clergy, counselors, and clients often find
themselves try-ing to reconcile real-life pain with biblical
teach-ing on divorce and remarriage. For example, if the obvious
teaching of Jesus allows for divorce only in the case of adultery or
desertion by an unbelieving spouse, what do we do about spousal
abuse? Are abused women or men left to choose between disobedience
and safety? Into this whirlpool steps David Instone-Brewer. In
Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible, Instone-Brewer dons his
biblical scholar's cap and explores the social context of the
first-century Jewish and Greco-Roman world and the literary context
of the biblical texts. His purpose is to understand "the meaning of
the New Testament teaching on divorce and remarriage as it would
have been understood by its original readers" (p. xi) and to shed
fresh light on our traditional understandings about divorce and
remarriage.
The eleven chapters of Divorce and Remar-riage in the Bible
plunge the reader into the biblical world. Instone-Brewer uses the
social-historical contexts of the biblical narrative as an
interpretive lens for understanding key texts. Chapters 1 and 2
unpack the Mosaic teaching on divorce and remarriage by examining
the culture of the Ancient Near East. Chapter 3 examines the
teachings of the prophets and the Old Testament. Chapters 4 and 5
review the immense cultural changes that took place dur-ing the
intertestamental period, including increasing rights for women and
an in-depth discussion on the rabbinic debates (Shammaite vs.
Hillelites) about divorce and remarriage. This in turn provides the
cultural context for Jesus' teachings (Chapter 6) that arc
subse-quently contrasted with the Greco-Roman world that frames
Paul's instructions on divorce and remarriage (Chapter 7). While
Chapter 8 traces the biblical and Judaic history of contemporary
wedding vows, Instone-Brewer reviews the development of what he
considers to be misinterpretations of divorce and remarriage
through-out church history in Chapter 9. In Chapter 10 he offers
alternative interpretations of key New Testament texts about divorce
and remarriage based on data that he provided in Chapters 1 through
7. He concludes this work with some practical considerations for
pastors (Chapter II).
Many readers will discover that Instone-Brewer challenges some
commonly held interpretations of Jesus or Paul's position on divorce
and remar-riage. Instone-Brewer argues that the early church fathers
misinterpreted key biblical pas-sages on divorce and remarriage
because they did not have access to the history on first centu-ry
rabbinic debates about divorce (Chapter 5). These misunderstandings
continued through the Reformation and are now accepted as church
tradition. With the relatively recent discovery and translation of
ancient manuscripts such as the Qumran texts, biblical scholars now
have access to this critical missing data. For some this will be
disconcerting. For others, it will be a breath of fresh air. For
all, it will challenge us to become cognizant of our interpretive
stance when we read scripture.
Four features of the book's structure recom-mend it to a
discerning reader. First is the com-prehensive bibliography. Second
are indices of modern authors and subjects. Third is the index of
scripture and other ancient texts, which will be invaluable to those
who desire to delve more deeply into social and literary criticism.
Finally there is the structure of the work itself. Each chapter
opens with an abstract of its contents and closes with a review of
its main movements. Readers can therefore build scaffolding for
their understanding of the book by reviewing these in the order in
which they are presented. In between these opening and closing
summaries one finds a scholar at work. I particularly liked Chapter
10 (Modern Reinterpretations: Different Ways to Understand the
Biblical Text). Here Instone-Brewer uses a series of six questions
to organize the possible biblical interpretations on divorce and
remarriage in summary form. He concludes each question's discussion
with a sub-section that he labels ''my position." Readers are free
to agree or disagree with his conclusion. Unfortunately, his closing
chapter on pastoral consideration is the weakest aspect of this
work. Much to his credit, however, Instone-Brewer openly
acknowledges that his strength is biblical scholarship, not pastoral
counseling. I might sug-gest that this is where pastoral and
professional counselors need to pick up the proverbial baton.
Virginia Todd Holeman (Asbury Theological Semi-nary/Wilmore,
KY).
|