I read Divorce and Re-marriage in the Bible as the mem-bers of
the General Synod of the Church of England were debating their
report on Mar-riage in Church after Divorce, and making the historic
deci-sion to remove the restrictions prohibiting marriage in church
after divorce (in appropriate circumstances). Before the de-cision,
about 10 per cent of Church of England marriage involved divorced
people.
Experience knows what will hap-pen now and whether that Church's
experience will soon come to reflect the position in the Methodist
Church where more than 60 per cent of mar-riages each year involve
at least one person who has been div-orced?
Given the heat and passion of some of the views expressed at
General Synod, it was inter-esting to return to the cool prose of
Instone Brewer's book. The author is a research fellow at Tyndale
House in Cam-bridge. His book is an academic volume, with no
illustra-tions, hundreds of footnotes and many of the biblical
quo-tes in their original Hebrew or Greek (though always
translat-ed).
The book's basic argument is that biblical teaching and, in
particular, that of Jesus and Paul on divorce and remarria-ge is not
as simple as it some-times appears and has tradi-tionally been
expressed.
This argument is made by looking closely at the context in which
the biblical texts were written. The author explores other texts
from the ancient Near East and Judaism, along with other historical
evidence from the first-century Jewish and Greco-Roman world, to
look at the place of divorce and remarriage in contempo-rary Jewish
and surrounding cultures.
He suggests that at the time of Jesus there was broad agree-ment
about certain grounds for divorce, hut a major dis-agreement between
different rabbinic schools on one par-ticular ground. It is into
this argument that Jesus is drawn in his recorded comments on the
subject. The New Testa-ment's silence on Jesus' response to the
other, generally accepted, grounds is taken to mean he also accepted
them. To say any more in a short review would be to enter into
details that would require a special edition of the Meth-odist
Recorder. Suffice it to say that I found this a fasci-nating read
and a persuasive argument. It forced me to reconsider much that I
had taken for granted in my understanding of what the New Testament
says on one of today's most important issues.
However, in many ways, from a pragmatic point of view in 21st
century Britain the argument has now moved on. Those Christians who
accept that in appropriate cir-cumstances divorced people may marry
in church have used other arguments. But this book may make them
feel even more comfortable about their position.
• The Rev David Gamble is the secretary for Pastoral Care and
Personal Relationships in the Methodist Church Connexional Team.
|