|
Jesus in the Gospels only names one ground for divorce
– 'porneia' -- which is interpreted in various ways
(adultery, sexual immorality etc). But he doesn't mention abuse or
abandonment which you say is taught by Ex.21.10f. If Jesus was
silent about this, shouldn't we be silent as well?
|
|
|
Jesus didn't affirm the law of Ex.21.10f but Paul uses it as the
basis of 1Cor.7 to teach the obligations in marriage included
emotional support (v3-5) and material support (vv 32-35). The
grounds for divorce of emotional or material neglect were based on
Ex.21.10f because this says that if they are not given, the woman
can go free. These were the most important verses regarding divorce
in 1st C Judaism and are cited or alluded to in the early marriage
certificates. The fact that Jesus is silent on this important part
of the OT and Jewish law could mean that he disagreed with it but he
didn't want to upset his listeners. Or it could mean that he agreed
with it so he didn't need to say anything.
He didn't say anything about there being only one God, or that
rape is wrong, or that you should marry before sleeping with
someone. Does this mean that he disagreed with these OT teachings?
He said lots of other things about marriage & divorce, and all
of it in disagreement with a large proportion of Judaism, but in
this matter where all Jews agreed (that Ex.21.10f provides grounds
for divorce) he said nothing. My conclusion is that Jesus agreed
with them, because if he didn't, his silence was very cowardly and
totally confusing. |
|