Sacrament
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . argued that marriage was a sacrament, because the Vulgate . . .

Sacraments
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . be irreversible, just as the sacraments of baptism and . . .

Sacramentum
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . 'mystery' in Eph.5.32 as 'sacramentum'. He concluded . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . 'mystery' in Eph.5.32 as 'sacramentum'. He concluded . . .

Salisbury
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . Para.1085 by Osmund, Bishop of Salisbury. This is an . . .

Sanctified
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . the unbelieving husband is sanctified in the wife, and . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . , and the unbelieving wife is sanctified in the brother: . . .

Sarum
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . is preserved in the Use of Sarum, the most complete and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.5. . . portion of the the Use of Sarum adds to these basic vows . . .

Scandal
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . and it would have been a scandal to omit it. Whether or . . .

Scholarly
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.2. . . has been well known in the scholarly community for more . . .

Scholars
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.3. . . grounds for divorce./Scholars generally assume that . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.6. . . of Jesus. Therefore some scholars have tried to show . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . the mid-19th century, most scholars have recognized that . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.10. . . records of early rabbinic scholars./ . . .

School
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.3. . . a summary of this debate:/The School of Shammai says: A man . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.4. . . matter [Deut.24.1]./And the School of Hillel said: Even if . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.3. . . in Mishnah Gittin:/The School of Shammai says: "A man . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.3. . . matter [Dt.24.1]." And the School of Hillel says: "Even . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.4. . . Talmud is even shorter: The School of Shammai says: A man . . .

Schools
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.2. . . disagreed with both of these schools and with most other . . .

Scriptural
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.3. . . Spirit, and the nature of scriptural inspiration. These . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.4. . . marriage has very shaky Scriptural support, and makes . . .

Scripture
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.4. . . not immediately obvious in Scripture. A few churches . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.6. . . problem for those who regard Scripture as inspired, because . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.2. . . no ground for divorce in all Scripture, except 'Indecency'" . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . five grounds for divorce in Scripture: infertility (Gen.1. . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . . They also learned from Scripture that remarriage was . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.2. . . about the authority of Scripture and Tradition. In . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.2. . . a re-interpretation of Scripture on this topic, even . . .

Scrolls
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.5. . . with them. When the Dead Sea Scrolls were first discovered, . . .

Sea
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.5. . . with them. When the Dead Sea Scrolls were first . . .

Second
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . with the translation of this second phrase. First, there is . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . , from Hermas in the middle second century to Augustine in . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . this one ground included the second ground 'Indecency'. The . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.9. . . current legal debate./By the second century, however, this . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . slave wife when a man took a second wife. The lawyers . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . (1Cor.7.7f, Matt.19.12). The second is impossible because, . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . extrapolated this from the second half of the phrase 'an . . .

Secondly
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . vague and wide ranging. Secondly, most translations . . .

Section
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.2. . . Sifré (which was cited in the section on 'The Hillelite and . . .

Secular
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . this was a necessary part of secular morality and it would . . .

Separate
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . joined together, let not man separate." (7) They said to . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . Lord): A wife ought not to separate herself from her . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . separates, let them separate; the brother or . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . for either 'dismiss' or 'separate from', which . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . for either 'dismiss' or 'separate from', which suggests . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . documents, both 'dismiss' and 'separate from' were used to . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . , both 'dismiss' and 'separate from' were used to . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . God has joined, let no-one separate' have often been . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . whom God has joined cannot separate'. In both Matthew and . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . Matthew and Mark, the verb 'separate' is in the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . Matthew and Mark, the verb 'separate' is in the imperative . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . a plea, i.e. 'Please do not separate' or 'You must not . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . separate' or 'You must not separate!'. Both of these . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . it is possible for couples to separate but they should not . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.2. . . that they must not 'separate themselves' from . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.2. . . that they must not 'separate themselves' from . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . merely the freedom to remain separate. However, someone who . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . had no choice but to remain separate. Once their partner . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.3. . . , the command 'let no man separate' implied that divorce . . .

Separated
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . . As soon as a couple separated, either partner was . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . that the woman 'has been separated' (passive), but the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . Greek form can also mean 'has separated herself' (reflexive) . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.2. . . any believer who had already separated that they must . . .

Separates
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . husband (11) (and even if she separates herself, she ought . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . . (15) But if the unbeliever separates, let them separate; . . .

Separating
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.6. . . world was enacted simply by separating from a partner or . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . Israel and later temporarily separating from Judah (Hos.2.2 . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . . This was enacted simply by separating - by mutual . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . their unbelieving partner by separating from them. Some . . .

Separation
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . stages of marriage breakup - separation and divorce. . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.6. . . of a difference between separation and divorce. If . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . them. There was no concept of separation without divorce or . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . separation without divorce or separation preceding divorce . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . of a minimum period of separation or desertion. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . of separation or desertion. Separation was considered to . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . about the reason for separation. He said that it . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . similar to the present day separation of couples who live . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . desertion, cruelty and mutual separation. The Family Law Act . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.2. . . of Jerusalem, and the separation of the church and . . .

Series
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . breakdown' by a series of 'proofs' such as . . .

Serious
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.3. . . there have been many more serious doctrinal disputes, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . divorce, in order to show how serious it was. This is . . .

Sermon
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.1. . . and as a short saying in the Sermon on the Mount (Matt.5.31 . . .

Servant
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . regard themselves as the servant of the other. This . . .

Serve
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . the woman vows to 'obey, serve, esteem, honour, and . . .

Service
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . the other. This language of 'service' and 'authority' is . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . the other. This language of 'service' and 'authority' is . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . traditional Christian wedding service contains references to . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . basis for the modern marriage service. In the Latin portion, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . that they take part in a service of 'Repentance for . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . conducted this as a prayer service for myself and both . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . asked to be excused from this service. A form of words which . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.6. . . were 'innocent'. Ideally this service occurs after the . . .

Services
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.8. . . here./Most Christian marriage services are based on this . . .

Serving
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . distract a believer from serving God, which is why he . . .

Sewing
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . to provide, and the amount of sewing and cooking which the . . .

Sex
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.7. . . forbidding polytheism or sex before marriage, because . . .

Sexual
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . or 'except on the grounds of sexual immorality', or . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . , including anything from a sexual indiscretion to . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . indiscretion to grievous sexual degradation. I have . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.1. . . those who wanted to limit sexual relations within . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.1. . . partners. He said that sexual relations are an . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.7. . . usage, porneia meant general sexual immorality, especially . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . ground for divorce - lack of sexual faithfulness - but the . . .

Sexually
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . , but that they had to be sexually moral. They had to be . . .

Shaky
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.4. . . marriage has very shaky Scriptural support, and . . .

Shammai
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.3. . . of this debate:/The School of Shammai says: A man should . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.3. . . Mishnah Gittin:/The School of Shammai says: "A man should . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.4. . . even shorter: The School of Shammai says: A man should not . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.2. . . have mentioned the Hillel and Shammai debate but the . . .

Shammaite
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . topless./The Hillelite and Shammaite Debate: Since the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.6. . . except 'Indecency'" (the Shammaite interpretation). . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.2. . . does not mean that he was a Shammaite, because he usually . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.2. . . section on 'The Hillelite and Shammaite Debate' above) is . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.5. . . that the wording of the Shammaite viewpoint in these . . .

Shammaites
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . phrase in Deut.24.1 which the Shammaites interpreted as . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . and 'Indecency', whereas the Shammaites interpreted it as a . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . ground 'Indecency'. The Shammaites emphasized that . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.9. . . CE resulted in the end of the Shammaites and the triumph of . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.2. . . clear that he sided with the Shammaites. This does not mean . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.8. . . , one might conclude that the Shammaites only allowed . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . by both the Hillelites and Shammaites./When Jesus denied . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.2. . . only allowable ground. The Shammaites used exactly the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.2. . . other types of divorce. The Shammaites meant that "there . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.2. . . likely that Jesus, like the Shammaites and all other Jews, . . .

Shorter
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . The Shorter Accounts: The shortest . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.4. . . the Jerusalem Talmud is even shorter: The School of Shammai . . .

Shortest
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . The Shorter Accounts: The shortest summary of Jesus' . . .

Sifré
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.2. . . . The abbreviated account in Sifré (which was cited in the . . .

Silence
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . Jesus' silence on other grounds for . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . this matter. An argument from silence is always precarious, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . on this occasion, because his silence is so surprising. . . .

Silent
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.8. . . then consider why Jesus was silent about them./ . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . otherwise he wouldn't be silent on this matter. An . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.3. . . clothing or love'./Jesus was silent on these three . . .

Sin
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.3. . . remarriage was 'not a grave sin'./The concept of . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.2. . . might imply that their sin does not matter. However, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.2. . . vows is an unforgivable sin. Also, if the church . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.4. . . . Please forgive me for my sin, and give comfort to those . . .

Sinfulness
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . . This emphasized that the sinfulness of divorce lay in . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.4. . . should instead emphasize the sinfulness of causing divorce . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . after a divorce, but the sinfulness of breaking former . . .

Single
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . interpreted it as a single ground for divorce, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . is why he chose to remain single. The Pharisees . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.4. . . also applied to any other single younger people from . . .

Singleness
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . referred to maintaining the singleness of a divorcee. As 2 . . .

Sinner
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . vows are broken, but the sinner is encouraged to repent . . .

Sinners
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.4. . . divorcees into guilty sinners. Therefore the church . . .

Sister
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . them separate; the brother or sister is no longer enslaved . . .

Slave
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . text referred originally to a slave wife when a man took a . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . The lawyers argued that if a slave wife had these rights, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.3. . . was like an emancipated slave - for the first time she . . .

Slavery
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.3. . . of emancipation from slavery. The two documents had . . .

Smoke
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . strange command 'Do not smoke'./These two phrases have . . .

Specific
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . . Jesus was asked about a specific issue (the 'Any . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.1. . . other countries, and teach specific grounds for divorce?/ . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.3. . . has therefore been away from specific grounds for divorce . . .

Specifically
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . contract and they were specifically quoted as such in . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . love'). Although Paul did not specifically refer to these . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . or not this was also part of specifically Christian . . .

Spend
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.3. . . time she could chose how to spend her money, do business . . .

Spirit
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.6. . . at least fit in with the spirit of his teaching./Joseph . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . he added the exception in the spirit of Jesus' teaching. . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.3. . . leadership, gifts of the Holy Spirit, and the nature of . . .

Spoiled
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.4. . . of Hillel said: Even if she spoiled his dish, since it . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.3. . . of Hillel says: "Even if she spoiled his dish, since it . . .

Spouse
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . not remarry till a former spouse had died. The Church . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.3. . . the death of their former spouse. Luther and Calvin even . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . support, or subjected their spouse to physical or . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.4. . . where parents chose their spouse, so very few had been . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.2. . . themselves' from their spouse. He appealed to the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . more sense because if her spouse had chosen to divorce . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.4. . . over. Once someone's spouse has walked out or . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . were permitted more than one spouse, so 'woman of one man' . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . remarrying while a former spouse lives. If the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . married to a former living spouse, so they would have two . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.8. . . and be faithful to their spouse. Although we do not use . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.1. . . and remarry their original spouse?/Jesus' and Paul's . . .

Spouses
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . or wife neglected their spouse's material or emotional . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.1. . . divorcing their unbelieving spouses, which some believers . . .

St
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . account, and that any 1st century reader would have . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . legal terms. Any Jew in the 1st century would be familiar
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . these terms, just as any 21st century person is familiar . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . . For example, a 1st century Jew might think . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . of a divorcee. As 21st century readers, we are . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . is using, in the way that a 1st century reader would have . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . and divorce. However, in 1st century Greek documents, . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . we must ask how a 1st century reader would . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . punished with death in the 1st century, except . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . was extremely diverse in the 1st century, and unpopular . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.10. . . which were implicit for any 1st century reader. We will now . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.10. . . . We will now examine how a 1st century reader would have . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Ch.2 How 1st Century Jews Would Have . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Would Have Understood Jesus: 1st Century Interpretation: To . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . through the worldview of a 1st century Jewish or . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . of Pharisees in the early 1st century. The Hillelites . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . to his account, because any 1st century Jewish reader would . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . in this context for any 1st century Jew./To use a . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.8. . . permitted it. Therefore any 1st century Jew would add the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.2. . . it was still permitted in 1st century Palestine. Jesus, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . divorces which took place in 1st century Palestine. So, in . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.8. . . branches of Judaism in the 1st century accepted. We will . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.1. . . Other Grounds for Divorce in 1st Century Judaism: Before the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Ch.3 How 1st Century Converts Would Have . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Would Have Understood Paul: 1st Century Graeco-Roman . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . end to marriage in the 1st century Graeco-Roman world . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . have only one meaning for a 1st century reader. Modern . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . to enforce it. Also, to a 1st century reader, the phrase . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.5. . . who had been deserted, a 1st century reader would
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . man' is not found in the 1st century Graeco-Roman world, . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Ch.4 Summary Of The 1st Century Interpretation: 1st . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . 1st Century Interpretation: 1st century Jewish hearers and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Ch.5 Applying The 1st Century To The 21st Century . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . The 1st Century To The 21st Century Church: Marriage . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . did become a marriage vow in 1st century Judaism and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.8. . . the basis for divorce in the 1st century./ . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . it is not easy to apply the 1st century documents to a 21st . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . 1st century documents to a 21st century church./Before we . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.2. . . study we have found that a 1st century reader would have a . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . texts through the eyes of a 1st century believer. This '1st . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . 1st century believer. This '1st century' interpretation . . .

Stage
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.2. . . background at a very early stage due to the supremacy of . . .

Stages
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . Paul is talking about two stages of marriage breakup - . . .

State
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.3. . . Church decided to let the State deal with divorce, and . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.4. . . . Other churches allow the State to decide who divorces . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . a divorce certificate was to state this right. The only . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.5. . . for divorce. He did not state any other grounds for . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.5. . . even consider it pedantic to state this freedom./ . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.1. . . , neither of these verses state that marriage cannot end . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . highly about the unmarried state (1Cor.7.7f, Matt.19.12). . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . divorce certificate was to state this right. The . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.4. . . they have used the law of the State as a basis of their . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.2. . . for a large minority. The State now allows divorce on a . . .

Status
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.7. . . Jesus disagreed with the status quo, the Gospels record . . .

Stephen
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . which ruined a marriage and Stephen Clark widened Paul's

Stolen
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.4. . . and that nothing has been stolen./4) There are valid . . .

Stop
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . , the other was powerless to stop them. There was no . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.1. . . Paul was mainly concerned to stop believers from divorcing . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.4. . . . Therefore the church should stop teaching this uncertain . . .

Stoughton
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.4. . . and Divorce (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1984, Carlisle : . . .

Strange
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . 'cigarettes' to the otherwise strange command 'Do not smoke' . . .

Strength
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.4. . . down and hurt. I ask you for strength for the future, to be . . .

Strict
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.1. . . of principles rather than strict regulations./David . . .

Strictly
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . for all practical purposes. Strictly speaking, Jesus only . . .

Strive
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . Law which every man had to strive to fulfil. Since Jesus . . .

Stubbornly
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . adultery with the idols, and stubbornly refused to repent. . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . 9). Jeremiah said that Israel stubbornly refused to repent, . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . vows were repeatedly and stubbornly broken. They also . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . partner is hard-hearted, i.e. stubbornly breaking their . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.1. . . their vows, unless they are stubbornly unrepentant. Both . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.3. . . for divorce if they are stubbornly and unrepentantly . . .

Stubbornness
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . of 'hard-heartedness' (i.e. stubbornness). Jesus did not . . .

Study
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.2. . . and Tradition. In this study we have found that a 1st . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.4. . . questions arise from this study, a few of will now be . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.1. . . and Paul (according to this study)?/The 'traditional' . . .

Studying
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . in Matthew 23 without studying Jewish laws about . . .

Subject
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.6. . . debate because they were not subject to dispute, and an . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . of Jesus' words came to the subject of divorce and . . .

Subjected
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . or emotional support, or subjected their spouse to . . .

Substantial
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . adultery. Despite the very substantial abbreviations, . . .

Succeeding
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.10. . . the early Church Fathers and succeeding generations of . . .

Succession
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.3. . . Trinity, the Mass, Apostolic succession and, more recently, . . .

Suffer
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . readers, we are likely to suffer just as much . . .

Suffering
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.1. . . to allow divorce for those suffering physical and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.4. . . no solution for those who are suffering physical and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.2. . . a large minority of believers suffering abuse within . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . that the deserted person was suffering neglect of 'food, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.2. . . to remarry), has caused great suffering for a large minority . . .

Suggest
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . degree. Other interpreters suggest that Jesus and Paul . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . . Also, rabbinic traditions suggest that few adulterers, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . clothing'). However, he did suggest that this obligation . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . from them. Some translations suggest that the woman 'has . . .

Suggested
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.7. . . ./Joseph Bonsirven and others suggested that porneia ( . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . 1Cor.7.27, 39), so some have suggested it might mean . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . marriage vows, and Jesus suggested that a believer . . .

Suggestion
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . through mob violence./A suggestion by I. Abrahams and . . .

Suggests
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . or 'separate from', which suggests that Paul is talking . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.3. . . , because neither context suggests that Paul is . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . '1st century' interpretation suggests that Jesus and Paul . . .

Summaries
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . . Matthew added these two summaries to his account, . . .

Summarized
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . Hillelite position could be summarized as 'Any Matter', . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . divorce in this text, so they summarized their position with . . .

Summary
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . traditions recorded a summary of this debate:/The . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . Accounts: The shortest summary of Jesus' teaching (in . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Ch.4 Summary Of The 1st Century . . .

Superfluous
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . phrases because they would be superfluous. They may not even . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.8. . . this country?". It would be superfluous to add the words . . .

Supplant
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . breakdown' of marriage should supplant the concept of . . .

Support
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . material or emotional support, or subjected their . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . 'the world' because material support was commanded in Ex.21 . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . material and emotional support ('food, clothing and . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . was a command so he would not support a divorce on the . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.1. . . the obligations of emotional support (1Cor.7.3-5) and . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.1. . . (1Cor.7.3-5) and material support (1Cor.7.32-35)./Paul . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.4. . . has very shaky Scriptural support, and makes even . . .

Supremacy
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.2. . . a very early stage due to the supremacy of the Hillelites . . .

Survive
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . .3f)./4) Marriage should even survive adultery, when . . .

Survived
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . /Most of these additions have survived, except the . . .

Sykenesse
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.6. . . : for richer: for poorer: in sykenesse and in hele: to be . . .

Synagogue
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.2. . . separation of the church and synagogue. The traditional . . .

Synonymous
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . of words which were sometimes synonymous, and before we look . . .

System
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.1. . . under the Graeco-Roman legal system./The most common end to . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.3. . . towards a 'no-fault' divorce system. The same trend has . . .