Painfulness
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . , he still experienced the painfulness of divorce first . . .

Palestine
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . when the Roman government of Palestine began. Also, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.2. . . permitted in 1st century Palestine. Jesus, however, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . took place in 1st century Palestine. So, in effect, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.1. . . and Jews who lived outside Palestine, under the . . .

Paper-work
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . was one where the legal paper-work was error-free, or . . .

Papyrus
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . divorce. However, a recent papyrus has shown that Jewish . . .

Parents
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.4. . . some came from cultures where parents chose their spouse, so . . .

Part
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . because this was a necessary part of secular morality and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . Whether or not this was also part of specifically Christian . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . the condition that they take part in a service of . . .

Partially
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.2. . . Jesus' divorce teaching was partially rediscovered in the . . .

Particular
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.4. . . of what the Law meant, and in particular Deut.24.1 because . . .

Particularly
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.6. . . day. This makes the prayer particularly poignant and, . . .

Partner
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.6. . . simply by separating from a partner or dismissing a . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.6. . . a partner or dismissing a partner, so there was no . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . could only truly end when one partner died, which was why . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . seek to divorce an erring partner, but one should invite . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . to seek repentance from their partner and then forgive them, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.4. . . the person repulsive to their partner. Jesus rejected this . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . or obligations. If either partner broke these terms, the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . broke these terms, the other partner could choose to end . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . the marriage, and if one partner wanted the divorce, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . had occurred, even if neither partner had declared their . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . as a couple separated, either partner was free to remarry./ . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . . He said that each partner should regard . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . divorced their unbelieving partner by separating from . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . remain separate. Once their partner had left them, the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . e. faithful to their marriage partner./ . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . only be resorted to when a partner is hard-hearted, i.e. . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.1. . . , and should try to forgive a partner who has broken their . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.5. . . . However, if either partner has remarried, they . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.3. . . remarriage for the innocent partner, and even Augustine . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . be reconciled to a repentant partner who breaks their vows. . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . to repent and their partner is encouraged to . . .

Partners
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.1. . . and to divorce non-Christian partners. He said that sexual . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.1. . . to divorce their unbelieving partners, Paul reminded them . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.1. . . marriage ends when one of the partners dies (1Cor.7.39; Rom. . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.5. . . before God, and if neither partners have remarried they . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . myself and both prospective partners, even if one of them . . .

Party
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . Although God was the innocent party in this divorce, he . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . the marital home). Neither party had to give a reason for . . .

Passive
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . woman 'has been separated' (passive), but the same Greek . . .

Past
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.6. . . makes them feel as though the past is behind and that God . . .

Pastoral
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . Pastoral Implications: The . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . completely innocent./In pastoral practice I have . . .

Pastorally
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.1. . . Modern Interpretations: Pastorally minded theologians . . .

Pastorals
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.1. . . Husband of one wife?: The Pastorals say that a church . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . to remarry, because the Pastorals encourage widows to . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . concubine./Therefore the Pastorals are not saying that . . .

Paternoster
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.4. . . & Stoughton, 1984, Carlisle : Paternoster, 1997)/ . . .

Paul
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.3. . . God has called us in peace./Paul also says in v.39 that . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . from', which suggests that Paul is talking about two . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . were used to mean 'divorce'. Paul, like any author, used a . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.6. . . separation and divorce. If Paul had meant to imply any . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . Fathers pointed out that Paul also had one exception, . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.1. . . were stated by Jesus and Paul, while others regard the . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . suggest that Jesus and Paul were simply teaching the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.3. . . these three obligations, but Paul was not. Before looking . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.3. . . was not. Before looking at Paul, we must acquaint . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Would Have Understood Paul: 1st Century Graeco-Roman . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.1. . . Paul on Marriage: Paul, like . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.1. . . Paul on Marriage: Paul, like Jesus, was more . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.1. . . their unbelieving partners, Paul reminded them of their . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . speak of conjugal rights, but Paul spoke about obligations. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . the basis of this text, while Paul is concerned about the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . Obligations (1Cor.7.33-34). Paul said that a married . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . or wife. Surprisingly, Paul spoke positively about . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . the woman had to perform. Paul, in contrast, turned his . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.4. . . choose a believer. Therefore Paul said that a widow or . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.1. . . Paul on Divorce: Paul was . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.1. . . Paul on Divorce: Paul was mainly concerned to . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.2. . . form of no-fault divorce. Paul told the Corinthians that . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.5. . . valid grounds for divorce. Paul condemned the no-fault . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . the teaching of Jesus./Did Paul allow the other Old . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . clothing and love'). Although Paul did not specifically . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.1. . . Paul on Remarriage: Some . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.1. . . remarriage in 1Cor.7.27 where Paul says that a person who is . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.4. . . to marry any man you wish'. Paul quotes these words in 1 . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.5. . . her husband was dead../When Paul said 'you are no longer . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.1. . . till death occurs?: Paul says in two verses that a . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.2. . . about Jesus and the Law. Paul says that the Jewish . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.3. . . neither context suggests that Paul is providing an . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . is contradicted by Paul and Jesus who both speak . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.1. . . Paul, however, did allude to . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.2. . . support (1Cor.7.32-35)./Paul told believers that they . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.3. . . ./This was as close as Paul got to stating that . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.3. . . law was rarely enforced, so Paul would have had to tell . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.1. . . emphasis of both Jesus and Paul was that marriage should . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.1. . . unrepentant. Both Jesus and Paul condemned the no-fault . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.8. . . were affirmed by Jesus and Paul, and which were the basis . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.1. . . were affirmed by Jesus and Paul (according to this study) . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.2. . . committing adultery. Paul, on the other hand, told . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . were free from that marriage./Paul does not give any reason . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . , for the sake of peace'. Paul could have argued that . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . suggests that Jesus and Paul taught against no-fault . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . affirmed the first ground and Paul affirmed the others. They . . .

Pauline
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.3. . . , not impossible, and the Pauline passages which speak . . .

Pauls
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.1. . . Paul's teaching on divorce is . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . and Stephen Clark widened Paul's exception to a similar . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . is impossible to understand Paul's abhorrence of women who . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.3. . . readers did not really need Paul's permission. Remarriage . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.2. . . original spouse?/Jesus' and Paul's teaching appears to . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . was over./In the light of Paul's view, we need to look . . .

Peace
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . ]: for God has called us in peace./Paul also says in v.39 . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . except: 'God has called us in peace'. He is probably . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . phrase 'for the sake of peace', which means 'when the . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . solution, for the sake of peace'. Paul could have argued . . .

Pedantic
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.5. . . they might even consider it pedantic to state this freedom . . .

Penalty
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . authority to apply the death penalty for adultery, as the . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . would end when the death penalty was imposed. He . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . this case, and that the death penalty probably ended in 7 C. . . .

Perform
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . which the woman had to perform. Paul, in contrast, . . .

Perhaps
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . as 'adultery') and perhaps for desertion by an . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . it (1Cor.7.11). Some (or perhaps one) of the . . .

Period
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . was no concept of a minimum period of separation or . . .

Permissible
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . gave different examples of permissible grounds for . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . to emphasize that divorce was permissible but not compulsory

Permission
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.3. . . did not really need Paul's permission. Remarriage was . . .

Permitted
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.8. . . , because Deut.24.1 clearly permitted it. Therefore any 1 . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.2. . . Lev.18.18) and it was still permitted in 1st century . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . , divorce is reluctantly permitted when there is a . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . was allowed, only men were permitted more than one spouse . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . principle is that divorce is permitted when marriage vows . . .

Pharisaic
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . 1st century, and unpopular Pharisaic rules were often . . .

Pharisees
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.1. . . the form of a debate with the Pharisees (Matt.19.3-9; Mark 1 . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . in bold./Matt.19.3-9 The Pharisees came up to him and . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.4. . . phrases is that it makes the Pharisees' question relatively . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.5. . . and remarriage, so that the Pharisees were asking if Jesus . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.6. . . Matthew's addition if the Pharisees knew that Jesus . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.10. . . find a context in which the Pharisee's question would be . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Jesus' criticisms of the Pharisees in Matthew 23 . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . debate between two groups of Pharisees in the early 1st . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . ervat davar). The Hillelite Pharisees interpreted the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.6. . . debate went as follows:/The Pharisees asked Jesus: "Does . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . adultery, when possible. The Pharisees said that Moses . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . context , because the Pharisees tried to make . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . a valid ground. Unlike the Pharisees, he encouraged . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.1. . . Jesus on Divorce: The Pharisees eventually brought . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . this obligation is based. The Pharisees discussed how long a . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . chose to remain single. The Pharisees discussed the exact . . .

Phrase
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . of interpreting them. The phrase 'any matter' is usually . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . for any reason at all. The phrase 'except for indecency' . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . translation of this second phrase. First, there is . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . on their interpretation of a phrase in Deut.24.1 which the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . 1]./The dispute concerned the phrase 'a matter of indecency' . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . Pharisees interpreted the phrase as two grounds for . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . their position with the phrase 'nothing except . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.2. . . used exactly the same phrase, and we know that they . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . 'freed' from a betrothal./The phrase 'no longer enslaved' is . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . to a 1st century reader, the phrase would remind them of . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.3. . . marry any man you wish'./The phrase 'no longer enslaved' is . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.1. . . .3.2) and the corresponding phrase 'woman of one man' . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . from the second half of the phrase 'an indecent matter' in . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.2. . . divorces and said that the phrase in Deuteronomy only . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . to the technical rabbinic phrase 'for the sake of peace' . . .

Phrases
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . , commits adultery."/The two phrases which are in Matthew . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . that Matthew added these phrases, while others think . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . that Matthew added these phrases to an originally . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . 'Do not smoke'./These two phrases have been translated . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.4. . . with removing Matthew's phrases is that it makes the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . recognized that the extra phrases in Matthew's account . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . was correct to add these phrases to his account, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . Luke, did not contain these phrases because they would be . . .

Physical
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.1. . . divorce for those suffering physical and emotional abuse. . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . or subjected their spouse to physical or emotional abuse./A . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.4. . . for those who are suffering physical and emotional abuse . . .

Plain
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . Church Fathers followed the 'plain' meaning of these texts . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . Church Fathers followed the 'plain' meaning of these texts, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.2. . . the advantages of being the 'plain' reading of the text, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.2. . . the advantages of being the 'plain' reading of the text, as . . .

Plea
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . indicates a command or a plea, i.e. 'Please do not . . .

Please
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . a command or a plea, i.e. 'Please do not separate' or . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . a command or a plea, i.e. 'Please do not separate' or . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . of this world', so that they 'please' their husband or wife . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . of this world', so that they 'please' their husband or wife. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . said that they should seek to 'please' their husband or wife . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . that they should seek to 'please' their husband or wife. . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.4. . . fulfilled this as I should. Please forgive me for my sin, . . .

Pliant
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . meant 'good', 'buxom' meant 'pliant', and 'in bed and at . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . meant 'good', 'buxom' meant 'pliant', and 'in bed and at . . .

Plight
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.6. . . it wol ordeyne, and thereto I plight the my trouthe./Most of . . .

Poignant
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.6. . . makes the prayer particularly poignant and, according to . . .

Polygamist
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.3. . . , or/b) he must not be a polygamist, or/c) he must not . . .

Polygamy
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.5. . . regarded as a criticism of polygamy and not divorce or . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.2. . . . The Old Testament allowed polygamy (it is assumed in . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . because, even where polygamy was allowed, only men . . .

Polytheism
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.7. . . never record Jesus forbidding polytheism or sex before . . .

Poorer
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.6. . . : for wors: for richer: for poorer: in sykenesse and in . . .

Popular
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.4. . . it. He said that the popular divorces for 'Any . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.1. . . so they soon became very popular./The traditional Old . . .

Popularized
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . Abrahams and others which was popularized by William Heth . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . right. The Hillelites had popularized a new no-fault . . .

Porneia
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . except for 'Indecency' [Greek porneia], and marries another, . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . in translating the word porneia because this has a . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.7. . . and others suggested that porneia ('indecency') meant . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.7. . . , in normal Greek usage, porneia meant general sexual . . .

Powerless
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . the divorce, the other was powerless to stop them. There . . .

Practical
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.9. . . the question had no further practical importance because . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . essentially correct for all practical purposes. Strictly . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.2. . . yet applied this insight to practical theology./ . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.3. . . be said that they have fewer practical consequences for . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.4. . . for public morality./Several practical questions arise from . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.4. . . ended if the church taught a practical set of grounds for . . .

Practice
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . Graeco-Roman law, though in practice this was . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . innocent./In pastoral practice I have remarried . . .

Practices
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.4. . . follow a wide variety of practices. The Catholic church . . .

Pragmatic
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . the law fails, we follow a pragmatic solution, for the . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . . But instead, he took the pragmatic view that the . . .

Prayer
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.2. . . only be for the sake of extra prayer time./2) Material . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . . I have conducted this as a prayer service for myself and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.5. . . will make. Amen./Minister: (A prayer for the couple's . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.6. . . following day. This makes the prayer particularly poignant . . .

Precarious
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . from silence is always precarious, but it may be . . .

Preceding
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . without divorce or separation preceding divorce and, unlike . . .

Present
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . was similar to the present day separation of . . .

Presented
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . H. Charles argued that Jesus presented his teaching on . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.2. . . , even though much of what is presented here has been well . . .

Preserved
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . . The older version, which is preserved in Mark and Luke, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.10. . . of Christians, though it was preserved in the legal records . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . liturgical tradition is preserved in the Use of Sarum, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . grounds for divorce have been preserved in the Christian . . .

Presumably
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . to get her to repent. Presumably Jesus meant that . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . this interpretation, he presumably also repudiated the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.4. . . Lord' (1Cor.7.39) though this presumably also applied to any . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.5. . . grounds for divorce, but presumably he also allowed . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . is guilty of actual adultery. Presumably mental adultery was . . .

Presuppositions
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . and remarriage with several presuppositions. All branches . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . with many other Jewish presuppositions about marriage . . .

Principle
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . Paul were simply teaching the principle that marriage should . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . God as a divorcee: The principle behind the Old . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . Asunder recommended that the principle of 'irretrievable . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . ceremony. The biblical principle is that divorce is . . .

Principles
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.1. . . New Testament as a source of principles rather than strict . . .

Prized
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . rare faithfulness was highly prized and honoured. The . . .

Procedures
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.3. . . and similar administrative procedures. Also, in some ways . . .

Procreation
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . the idea that marriage and procreation was a command so . . .

Promise
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.5. . . basic vows by having the wife promise:/I N take thee N to my . . .

Promised
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.4. . . me from my birth, and who has promised to love me . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.4. . . which I have not kept. I have promised to love and care for . . .

Promises
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . of 'Repentance for Broken Promises'. I have conducted . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . together that we have broken promises which we have made . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.4. . . . I confess that I have made promises to you and to others . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.4. . . , to be able to keep the promises which I will make. . . .

Prompt
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.4. . . his wife?' This should prompt the answer: 'Of course, . . .

Proof
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . was written for Gentiles. The 'proof' for this is usually . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . written for Gentiles. The 'proof' for this is usually the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.1. . . divorces did not require any proof or court appearances so . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . was considered to be the proof that divorce had . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.4. . . often had to provide her own proof that her husband was . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . to remove the need for proof but was found to be . . .

Proofs
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . breakdown' by a series of 'proofs' such as adultery, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . breakdown' by a series of 'proofs' such as adultery, . . .

Prophets
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . to repent. The Old Testament prophets said that God . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . Israel by the Old Testament prophets. They described God . . .

Proposals
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.10. . . their husbands./These various proposals have failed to find . . .

Prospective
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . service for myself and both prospective partners, even if . . .

Prostitution
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.7. . . sexual immorality, especially prostitution and adultery. . . .

Protect
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . to 'esteem, honour, keep, and protect' while the woman vows . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . , serve, esteem, honour, and protect'. This was derived . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.4. . . terms like 'esteem, honour, protect'. This same type of . . .

Protestant
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . /The Catholic Church and many Protestant churches followed . . .

Proved
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.1. . . of grounds which had to be proved in court if they were . . .

Provide
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.6. . . abuse./A husband had to provide food, cloth or money, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . clothing which the man had to provide, and the amount of . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . based on the obligations to provide material and emotional . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.4. . . whereas a widow often had to provide her own proof that her . . .

Provided
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . : God loved Israel and he provided food and clothing, . . .

Provides
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.4. . . against divorce, but it provides no solution for those . . .

Providing
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.3. . . context suggests that Paul is providing an exhaustive list . . .

Proving
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.4. . . because she had a certificate proving this right, whereas a . . .

Provision
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . of your contract' (v.14)./The provision of 'food clothing . . .

Public
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . who uncover their heads in public unless one realizes . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.1. . . often entailed embarrassing public accusations. The 'Any . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.3. . . practical consequences for public morality./Several . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.3. . . of restrictions, or whether public morality has changed./ . . .

Punished
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . few adulterers, if any, were punished with death in the 1st . . .

Punishment
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . the right to impose capital punishment, which occurred in . . .

Purpose
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . to remarry. In fact the main purpose of a divorce . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . (Deut.24.1-4), and the purpose of the divorce . . .

Purposes
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . correct for all practical purposes. Strictly speaking, . . .

Put
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . of divorce, and to put her away?" (8) He said to . . .

Putting
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . . The Anglican Church report Putting Asunder recommended . . .