Main
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.6. . . , clothing or love' were the main grounds for divorce . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . right to remarry. In fact the main purpose of a divorce . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.1. . . divorce, which is now the main type of divorce in the UK . . .

Mainly
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.1. . . Paul on Divorce: Paul was mainly concerned to stop . . .

Maintained
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . , compulsory in Judaism. They maintained that Mark, who was . . .

Maintaining
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . 'maintenance' referred to maintaining the singleness of . . .

Maintenance
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . like 'no-fault divorce' and 'maintenance'. For example, a . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . like 'no-fault divorce' and 'maintenance'. For example, a 1 . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . was error-free, or that 'maintenance' referred to . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . was error-free, or that 'maintenance' referred to . . .

Mal
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . concluded 'I hate divorce' (Mal.2.16)./ . . .

Malachi
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . process of divorce. Therefore Malachi defined divorce as . . .

Male
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . from the beginning made them male and female, [Gen.1.27] (5 . . .

Man
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . ) and said, For this reason a man shall leave his father and . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . has joined together, let not man separate." (7) They said . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.4. . . They ask: 'Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?' This . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.3. . . The School of Shammai says: A man should not divorce his . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.8. . . question "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?" was . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . .19.10-12). Jesus said that a man may choose to be a eunuch . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . of the Law which every man had to strive to fulfil. . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.3. . . School of Shammai says: "A man should not divorce his . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.4. . . The School of Shammai says: A man should not divorce his . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . to a slave wife when a man took a second wife. The . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . are now free to marry any man you wish.'. Very similar . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . food and clothing which the man had to provide, and the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . are now free to marry any man you wish'./The phrase 'no . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.4. . . are now free to marry any man you wish'. Paul quotes . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.1. . . a church leader should be 'a man of one woman' (! Tim.3.2) . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.1. . . phrase 'woman of one man' occurs in relation to . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . one spouse, so 'woman of one man' would not make sense. The . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . who were faithful to one man throughout their lives. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . The corresponding 'one-woman man' is not found in the 1st . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . was considered normal for a man to have a mistress, and . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . moral. They had to be 'a man of one woman' or 'a woman . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . one woman' or 'a woman of one man' - i.e. faithful to their . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . . In the Latin portion, the man vows to 'esteem, honour, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.3. . . loves himself. (29) For no man ever hates his own flesh, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.3. . . above, the command 'let no man separate' implied that . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . which we have made before man and God. I have never . . .

Marital
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . (depending on who owned the marital home). Neither party . . .

Mark
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.1. . . the Pharisees (Matt.19.3-9; Mark 10.2-12) and as a short . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.1. . . literal way. The words which Mark does not include are . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . are in Matthew but not in Mark are also found in . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . , while others think that Mark and Luke omitted them . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.3. . . generally assume that Mark's version is oldest, and . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . . Also it is uncertain that Mark's version was written for . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . Judaism. They maintained that Mark, who was writing for . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . this is usually the fact that Mark mentions a woman . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . , which is preserved in Mark and Luke, did not contain . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . distinction is obscured in Mark, and it is possible that . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.1. . . of the older account in Mark and Luke did not need to . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . . In both Matthew and Mark, the verb 'separate' is . . .

Marriage
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.1. . . limit sexual relations within marriage and to divorce . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.1. . . are an obligation within marriage (vv. 3-5), and he . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.3. . . ./Paul also says in v.39 that marriage is ended by death. . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.3. . . verse at Rom.7.2) that marriage can only end by death . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . talking about two stages of marriage breakup - separation . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . . They also concluded that a marriage could only truly end . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . by Augustine who argued that marriage was a sacrament, . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . . He concluded that marriage must therefore be . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.4. . . , which means that the former marriage can be declared as . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.4. . . having occurred, so another marriage will not really be . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . anything which ruined a marriage and Stephen Clark . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . teaching the principle that marriage should continue if . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.7. . . ) meant 'illegitimate marriage', so that Jesus . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . case of adultery, because the marriage would end when the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.1. . . Jesus on Marriage: When Jesus was asked . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.1. . . the occasion to speak about marriage, which he considered . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.1. . . taught about other aspects of marriage where he agreed with . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.2. . . Jewish teaching:/1) Marriage is monogamous. The . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.3. . . in the Old Testament./2) Marriage is designed to be . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . if at all possible./3) Marriage should only be ended . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . in the context of marriage or divorce. Jeremiah . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . who repent (Luke 17.3f)./4) Marriage should even survive . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . in the case of adultery./5) Marriage is not compulsory. . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.7. . . polytheism or sex before marriage, because all branches . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.4. . . for divorce when he said that marriage was not compulsory ( . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.4. . . not compulsory (see 'Jesus on Marriage' above)./3) Exod.21.1 . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . grounds for divorce was that marriage was a contract, and . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . of the contract were the marriage vows or obligations. . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . lay in the breaking of marriage vows, and not it the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . and love' were terms in a marriage contract and they . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . in several ancient Jewish marriage contracts. One . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . Is.50.1). Ezekiel listed the marriage vows which God had . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . of other matters concerning marriage and divorce where he . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . ./The most common end to marriage in the 1st century . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . give a reason for ending the marriage, and if one partner . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.1. . . Paul on Marriage: Paul, like Jesus, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.1. . . Jesus, was more interested in marriage than divorce. When . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.1. . . of their obligations within marriage./1) Conjugal . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.4. . . remarriage (see below), their marriage is certainly over. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . them as obligations within marriage (1Cor.7.3-5, 33-34)./
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.1. . . a person who is 'freed' from marriage may get married. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.1. . . says in two verses that a marriage ends when one of the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.1. . . of these verses state that marriage cannot end with . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.1. . . is the only way to end a marriage. They do not mention . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.2. . . the Law never breaks any marriage vows. Their only hope . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.2. . . . Their only hope is that the marriage will end in death. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.2. . . of Christ, which ends their marriage to the Law, and frees . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.3. . . ./None of this implies that marriage can only end by death . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.3. . . list of the ways in which a marriage can end./ . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . . If the indissoluble view of marriage is correct, a . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . man' - i.e. faithful to their marriage partner./ . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . as the vows implicit in a marriage contract. The Old . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . Jewish presuppositions about marriage and divorce. He used . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . teach monogamy and lifelong marriage. He did not deny . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . .e. stubbornly breaking their marriage vows. He therefore . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . He also denied the idea that marriage and procreation was a . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.1. . . reminded the Corinthians that marriage includes the . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.1. . . both Jesus and Paul was that marriage should be life-long, . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.1. . . of a divorce by breaking marriage vows, and should try . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . To The 21st Century Church: Marriage vows in Christian . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . originally the basis of the marriage vows./The oldest . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . the basis for the modern marriage service. In the Latin . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.4. . . and cherish'). Ancient Jewish marriage contracts also . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.4. . . found its way into Christian marriage vows, which can . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . .5.28f. Obedience was never a marriage vow in the Old . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . , though it did become a marriage vow in 1st century . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.8. . . discuss here./Most Christian marriage services are based on . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.8. . . .21.10f. This means that our marriage vows include all the . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . who live together without a marriage ceremony. The Jewish . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . 'irretrievable breakdown' of marriage should supplant the . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.4. . . emotional abuse within their marriage. Many Christians have . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.3. . . can be taught on the basis of marriage vows so that they are . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.3. . . The church should teach that marriage vows form grounds for . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.2. . . that they were free from that marriage./Paul does not give . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . and was irreversible, so the marriage was over./In the . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.5. . . , it still marks the end of a marriage. The person who . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.5. . . by breaking up yet another marriage./ . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.3. . . which speak about the end of marriage through death do not . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.4. . . ./The concept of indissoluble marriage has very shaky . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.4. . . causing divorce by breaking marriage vows./ . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.2. . . , this implies that breaking marriage vows is an . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.6. . . where they will take their marriage vows the following . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . a divorce by breaking their marriage vows, and Jesus . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . preserved in the Christian marriage ceremony. The . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . divorce is permitted when marriage vows are broken, but . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . sinfulness of breaking former marriage vows should be . . .

Marriages
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.3. . . and recognized that divorced marriages were 'dead' so that . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.2. . . suffering abuse within marriages or feeling guilty . . .

Married
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . :/1Cor.7.10-15: And to the married I command (not I, but . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.4. . . asleep, she is free to be married to whom she wishes; . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.7. . . those who were not validly married. However, in normal . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.6. . . they were theoretically still married. Therefore, "if they . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.4. . . invalid, so they were still married. Therefore, if they . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . .7.33-34). Paul said that a married person should be . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.1. . . 'freed' from marriage may get married. However, the context . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.2. . . marry Christ but who is still married to the Law. The . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.2. . . :/a) a church leader must be married, or/b) he must not be . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . , a remarried person is still married to a former living . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . a church leader had to be married, or that they must not . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.8. . . This means that virtually all married Christians have vowed . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . modern 'no-fault' divorce of married couples. In neither . . .

Marries
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . [Greek porneia], and marries another, commits . . .

Marry
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.6. . . married. Therefore, "if they marry another, they are . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . were: 'You are now free to marry any man you wish.'. Very . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.4. . . ./3) Believers should only marry believers, if they have . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.4. . . a widow or widower should marry 'only in the Lord' (1Cor . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . - 'You are now free to marry any man you wish'./The . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.4. . . were: 'You are now free to marry any man you wish'. Paul . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.2. . . is like someone who wants to marry Christ but who is still . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.2. . . to the Law, and frees them to marry Christ./None of this . . .

Mass
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.3. . . , such as the Trinity, the Mass, Apostolic succession and . . .

Material
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . wife neglected their spouse's material or emotional support, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . sake of extra prayer time./2) Material Obligations (1Cor.7.3 . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . about 'the world' because material support was commanded . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . on the obligations to provide material and emotional support . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.1. . . support (1Cor.7.3-5) and material support (1Cor.7.32-35 . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.1. . . for divorce - unfaithfulness, material neglect or abuse and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . grounds of unfaithfulness, material neglect and emotional . . .

Matrimonial
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . were introduced in The Matrimonial Causes Act 1937, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . supplant the concept of 'matrimonial offences'. This . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . supplant the concept of 'matrimonial offences'. This . . .

Matt
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.1. . . a debate with the Pharisees (Matt.19.3-9; Mark 10.2-12) and . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.1. . . in the Sermon on the Mount (Matt.5.31f, Luke 16.18). The . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.1. . . , Luke 16.18). The version in Matt.19, which is the fullest, . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . include are marked in bold./Matt.19.3-9 The Pharisees came . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . after the debate on divorce (Matt.19.10-12). Jesus said . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.5. . . a matter of 'Indecency'... (Matt.5.32). Whoever divorces . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.5. . . , except for 'Indecency'... (Matt.19.9)/There is much more . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . unmarried state (1Cor.7.7f, Matt.19.12). The second is . . .

Matter
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . to divorce his wife for 'Any Matter'?" (4) He answered, " . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . them. The phrase 'any matter' is usually translated . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . letters at the start of 'Any Matter' and 'Indecency' . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . divorce called 'Any Matter'. This was based on . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.3. . . he found in her an indecent matter [Deut.24.1]./And the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.4. . . dish, since it says: [Any] matter [Deut.24.1]./The . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . concerned the phrase 'a matter of indecency' (Hebrew . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . two grounds for divorce: 'Any Matter' and 'Indecency', . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . could be summarized as 'Any Matter', because this one . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.6. . . .24.1) allow divorce for 'Any Matter'?" (the Hillelite . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.6. . . who were divorced for 'Any Matter' were not validly . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.8. . . words "on the grounds of 'Any Matter'". These words were . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.9. . . . If they wanted an 'Any Matter' divorce, they had to . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.1. . . his opinion about the 'Any Matter' divorces, he did not . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.4. . . imply) but divorces for 'Any Matter' - the new type of . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.4. . . the popular divorces for 'Any Matter' were invalid, so they . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.1. . . Jesus only condemned the 'Any Matter' divorces, but this . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.3. . . his wife except if he found a matter of 'Indecency' in her, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.3. . . he found in her an indecent matter [Dt.24.1]." And the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.3. . . he finds in her an indecent matter [Dt.24.1]."/The later . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.5. . . his wife, except for a matter of 'Indecency'... (Matt . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.1. . . Before the invention of 'Any Matter' divorces, a Jew could . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.1. . . public accusations. The 'Any Matter' divorces did not . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.3. . . :/1) Deut.24.1: 'an indecent matter', i.e. adultery (as . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.6. . . for divorce before the 'Any Matter' divorce was introduced . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . condemned the Hillelite 'Any Matter' divorces and accepted . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . he wouldn't be silent on this matter. An argument from . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . a specific issue (the 'Any Matter' divorces) but before . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . intention to divorce./In the matter of remarriage, the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.2. . . Judaism - the Hillelite 'Any Matter' divorce./2) If they . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . no-fault divorce called 'Any Matter', which quickly become . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . of the phrase 'an indecent matter' in Deut.24.1./Jesus . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.2. . . asked if he agreed with 'Any Matter' divorces and said that . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.2. . . anyone got divorced for 'Any Matter' (unless it was a . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.2. . . 'Any Matter' (unless it was a matter of 'Indecency') they . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . ceremony. The Jewish 'Any Matter' divorce was similar to . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.2. . . imply that their sin does not matter. However, if only the . . .

Matters
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . . (12) But concerning other matters I say, not the Lord: . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.2. . . Hillelite position on other matters. Jesus was an . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.2. . . with regard to several other matters, as listed above./ . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . about a large number of other matters concerning marriage . . .

Matthew
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . /The two phrases which are in Matthew but not in Mark are . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . many interpreters think that Matthew added these phrases, . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . them when they abbreviated Matthew. I will argue that . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . Matthew. I will argue that Matthew added these phrases to . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.3. . . version is oldest, and that Matthew or the church later . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.6. . . as inspired, because Matthew would be dramatically . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . traditions. He said that Matthew was aware that . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.10. . . teaching. Therefore Matthew has either changed . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . of the Pharisees in Matthew 23 without studying . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . 'nothing except Indecency'. Matthew added these two . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . are committing adultery"./Matthew was correct to add . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . Mark, and it is possible that Matthew invented it, though it . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . . This teaching in found in Matthew immediately after the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.1. . . to their question. Whilst Matthew made it clear that . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.1. . . additions such as those in Matthew, would have been . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . cannot separate'. In both Matthew and Mark, the verb . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.5. . . to the two versions in Matthew: Every one who . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.6. . . 9.9)/There is much more which Matthew and the rabbinic . . .

Matthews
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . not in Mark are also found in Matthew's version of the short . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.4. . . /One difficulty with removing Matthew's phrases is that it . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.6. . . would also make sense without Matthew's addition if the . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.6. . . the Law. This would mean that Matthew's exception for . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.6. . . have tried to show that Matthew's additions were . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.10. . . would be meaningful without Matthew's additions. They have . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.10. . . have also failed to show how Matthew's additions could . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . that the extra phrases in Matthew's account refer to a . . .

Meals
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.6. . . woman had to make them into meals and clothing. The . . .

Men
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . her husband, because only men could initiate divorce. . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.6. . . polygamy was allowed, only men were permitted more than . . .

Mental
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . actual adultery. Presumably mental adultery was not a . . .

Mentally
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . 1st century reader would have mentally added them, just as . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.3. . . added them, just as we mentally add the word . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.7. . . Jewish reader would have mentally done likewise. The . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . conclusion that a person who mentally commits adultery is . . .

Metaphor
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.1. . . Rom.7.2 is a rather complex metaphor where divorce would . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.2. . . of place./Romans 7.1-4 is a metaphor about Jesus and the . . .

Mid
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.2. . . partially rediscovered in the mid 1800s. Since then, . . .

Mid-
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . Shammaite Debate: Since the mid-19th century, most . . .

Middle
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.1. . . , from Hermas in the middle second century to . . .

Minded
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.1. . . Interpretations: Pastorally minded theologians have tried

Minimum
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . , there was no concept of a minimum period of separation . . .

Minister
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.5. . . which I will make. Amen./Minister: (A prayer for the . . .

Minority
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.2. . . , and leave a large minority of believers . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.2. . . great suffering for a large minority. The State now allows . . .

Mishnah
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.2. . . ) is further abbreviated in Mishnah Gittin:/The School of . . .

Mistakes
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.6. . . help them not to make similar mistakes./ . . .

Mistress
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . normal for a man to have a mistress, and many also had a . . .

Misunderstanding
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.5. . . likely to suffer just as much misunderstanding, unless we . . .

Misunderstood
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . separate' have often been misunderstood as a statement . . .

Mixture
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.1. . . were largely written to a mixture of Greeks and Jews who . . .

Mob
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . , except occasionally through mob violence./A suggestion by . . .

Modern
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.4. . . remarriage could take place./Modern churches follow a wide . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.1. . . Modern Interpretations: . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.8. . . any 1st century Jew./To use a modern example, imagine . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . divorce and, unlike the modern world, there was no . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . is also ambiguous for a modern reader, though it would . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . for a 1st century reader. Modern interpreters have . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.2. . . became the basis for the modern marriage service. In . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . divorce was similar to the modern 'no-fault' divorce of . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . need to cite grounds in most modern divorces. Despite these . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.2. . . interpretation to that of a modern reader. This conclusion . . .

Money
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.6. . . had to provide food, cloth or money, and the woman had to . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.3. . . could chose how to spend her money, do business on her own . . .

Monogamous
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.2. . . teaching:/1) Marriage is monogamous. The Old Testament . . .

Monogamy
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.2. . . . Jesus, however, said that monogamy was the ideal in the . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . the Old Testament to teach monogamy and lifelong marriage . . .

Months
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.3. . . unmarried for more than 18 months after a divorce, though . . .

Moral
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.8. . . that they had to be sexually moral. They had to be 'a man . . .

Morality
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . a necessary part of secular morality and it would have . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.7. . . of specifically Christian morality is too large an issue . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.3. . . consequences for public morality./Several practical . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.3. . . , or whether public morality has changed./ . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.4. . . the State as a basis of their morality instead. This . . .

Moses
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . said to him, "Why then did Moses command one to give a . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . , "For your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . . The Pharisees said that Moses 'commanded' divorce for . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . , whereas Jesus said that Moses merely 'allowed' it. . . .

Mother
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his . . .

Mount
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.1. . . saying in the Sermon on the Mount (Matt.5.31f, Luke 16.18) . . .

Multiply
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . taught that 'go forth and multiply' was one of the 613 . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.4. . . .1.22, 28: 'be fruitful and multiply'. The Jews thought . . .

Mutual
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.1. . . , such as the importance of mutual love and respect, but . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . simply by separating - by mutual agreement, desertion, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . , desertion, cruelty and mutual separation. The Family . . .

Mystery
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . the Vulgate translated 'mystery' in Eph.5.32 as . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.2. . . the Vulgate translated 'mystery' in Eph.5.32 as . . .