Gain
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.6. . . , and even a woman could gain a divorce on these . . .

Gave
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . if possible, and that each gave different examples of . . .

Gen
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . made them male and female, [Gen.1.27] (5) and said, For . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . two shall become one flesh? [Gen.2.24] (6) So they are no . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.4. . . (as discussed above)./2) Gen.1.22, 28: 'be fruitful and . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . in Scripture: infertility (Gen.1.22, 28), unfaithfulness . . .

General
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.7. . . Greek usage, porneia meant general sexual immorality, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.1. . . . He also made some other general rulings about divorce. . . .

Generally
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.3. . . grounds for divorce./Scholars generally assume that Mark's . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.5. . . ; 11QTemple 57.15-19) are now generally regarded as a . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . teaching. However, it is generally accepted that the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.3. . . on her own behalf, and generally live life as she . . .

Generation
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.4. . . church were all first generation believers, and some . . .

Generations
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.10. . . Church Fathers and succeeding generations of Christians, . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.2. . . their day./Within a couple of generations, the Church had . . .

Gentiles
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . Mark, who was writing for Gentiles, did not include this . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . version was written for Gentiles. The 'proof' for this . . .

Gifts
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.3. . . recently, female leadership, gifts of the Holy Spirit, and . . .

Gittin
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.2. . . abbreviated in Mishnah Gittin:/The School of Shammai . . .

God
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.2. . . enslaved in such [cases]: for God has called us in peace./
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . Testament prophets said that God eventually had to divorce . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . ./Jesus' words 'Those whom God has joined, let no-one . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.3. . . , as if it said: 'Those whom God has joined cannot . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . God as a divorcee: The . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . prophets. They described God divorcing Israel and later . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . the marriage vows which God had kept but which Israel . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . but which Israel had broken: God loved Israel and he . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . (Jer.4.4 LXX). Although God was the innocent party in . . .
Chap.3 Sect.2 Para.3. . . a believer from serving God, which is why he chose to . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.8. . . Christians have vowed before God and the congregation to . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . not give any reason except: 'God has called us in peace'. . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . not give any reason except: 'God has called us in peace'. . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.5. . . grounds should repent before God, and if neither partners . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . we have made before man and God. I have never tried to . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.6. . . the past is behind and that God will help them not to make . . .

Gods
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.4. . . Jeremiah described Israel as God's 'hard-hearted' wife when . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . was the description of God's divorce from Israel by . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . The Old Testament example of God's divorce from Israel . . .

Gordon
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . by William Heth and Gordon Wenham, and more . . .

Gospel
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.10. . . The historical context of the Gospel accounts was therefore . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.1. . . respect, but the abbreviated Gospel accounts would not be
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.2. . . expect abbreviations in the Gospel account of the debate . . .
Chap.4 Sect.3 Para.2. . . the Jewish background of the Gospel divorce debate and . . .

Gospels
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.4. . . .24.1). The wording in both Gospels clearly implies that . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.1. . . expected to include this. The Gospels record the following . . .
Chap.2 Sect.3 Para.1. . . the final redaction of these Gospels some editorial . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.7. . . between each side./The Gospels normally omit to . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.7. . . with the status quo, the Gospels record his teaching./ . . .

Government
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . in 7 C.E. when the Roman government of Palestine began. . . .

Graeco-roman
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.6. . . below that divorce in the Graeco-Roman world was enacted . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . compulsory for adultery in Graeco-Roman law, though in . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.9. . . was unenforceable in both Graeco-Roman and Jewish law. . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.1. . . of a 1st century Jewish or Graeco-Roman convert. For . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.1. . . Understood Paul: 1st Century Graeco-Roman Culture: The New . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.1. . . outside Palestine, under the Graeco-Roman legal system./The . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.2. . . marriage in the 1st century Graeco-Roman world was . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . the matter of remarriage, the Graeco-Roman and Jewish world . . .
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.3. . . words occurred on most Graeco-Roman divorce . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.2. . . (1Cor.7.10-14) - the Graeco-Roman form of no-fault . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.5. . . accordance with Jewish law, Graeco-Roman law and the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . of the wording in Jewish and Graeco-Roman divorce . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . husbands or wives./An early Graeco-Roman reader, however, . . .
Chap.3 Sect.6 Para.7. . . not found in the 1st century Graeco-Roman world, because it . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.3. . . right, in both Jewish and Graeco-Roman law, that it . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . Pastoral Implications: The Graeco-Roman . . .

Grave
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.3. . . such remarriage was 'not a grave sin'./The concept of . . .

Great
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.2. . . right to remarry), has caused great suffering for a large . . .

Greatly
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.8. . . that the situation changed greatly when the Jews lost the . . .

Greek
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.2. . . wife, except for 'Indecency' [Greek porneia], and marries . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . of' which are not in the Greek text. Although these . . .
Chap.1 Sect.2 Para.5. . . . However, in 1st century Greek documents, both . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.7. . . married. However, in normal Greek usage, porneia meant . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.3. . . (passive), but the same Greek form can also mean 'has . . .
Chap.3 Sect.4 Para.2. . . , with the full force of Greek and Roman law to enforce . . .

Greeks
Chap.3 Sect.1 Para.1. . . written to a mixture of Greeks and Jews who lived . . .

Grievous
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . from a sexual indiscretion to grievous sexual degradation. I . . .

Ground
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . interpreted it as a single ground for divorce, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . Matter', because this one ground included the second . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . ground included the second ground 'Indecency'. The . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . that there was only one ground for divorce in this . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.5. . . when there was a valid ground. Unlike the Pharisees, . . .
Chap.2 Sect.2 Para.6. . . use of infertility as a ground for divorce, which . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.4. . . command made infertility a ground for divorce, and they . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.4. . . partner. Jesus rejected this ground for divorce when he . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.2. . . was the only allowable ground. The Shammaites used
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.2. . . meant that "there is no ground for divorce in Deut.24. . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.2. . . not mean that "there is no ground for divorce in all . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.5. . . 15 that desertion was a valid ground for divorce. He did not . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . church teaching has only one ground for divorce - lack of . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . adultery was not a literal ground for divorce. Similarly . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . , would not be a literal ground for divorce./Therefore, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.1. . . after divorce on a biblical ground?/The inability of . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . . Jesus affirmed the first ground and Paul affirmed the . . .

Grounds
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . adultery' or 'except on the grounds of sexual immorality', . . .
Chap.1 Sect.1 Para.4. . . 'in the case of' or 'on the grounds of' which are not in . . .
Chap.1 Sect.3 Para.3. . . even allowed divorce for grounds such as refusing . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.2. . . examples of permissible grounds for divorce./Scholars . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.5. . . interpreted the phrase as two grounds for divorce: 'Any . . .
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.8. . . add the obvious words "on the grounds of 'Any Matter'". . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.6. . . of the other Old Testament grounds for divorce which . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.8. . . for other Old Testament grounds which all branches of . . .
Chap.2 Sect.4 Para.8. . . will now look at those other grounds, and then consider why . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.1. . . Other Grounds for Divorce in 1st . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.1. . . for a limited number of grounds which had to be proved . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.2. . . The traditional Old Testament grounds for divorce were:/1) . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.5. . . . These three rights became grounds for divorce if a . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.6. . . or love' were the main grounds for divorce before the . . .
Chap.2 Sect.5 Para.6. . . could gain a divorce on these grounds. If she convinced a . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.1. . . behind the Old Testament grounds for divorce was that . . .
Chap.2 Sect.6 Para.2. . . a divorce which cited these grounds was the description of . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . Jesus' silence on other grounds for divorce: It is . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . about the other Old Testament grounds for divorce? It is . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . he agreed with these other grounds, because otherwise he . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.1. . . failed to mention the other grounds for divorce which were . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.5. . . stolen./4) There are valid grounds for divorce. Paul . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.5. . . . He did not state any other grounds for divorce, but . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . allow the other Old Testament grounds for divorce? These . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . grounds for divorce? These grounds are based on the . . .
Chap.3 Sect.3 Para.6. . . specifically refer to these grounds for divorce, he did . . .
Chap.3 Sect.5 Para.2. . . the Law. The believer has no grounds for divorce because . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.1. . . agreed that there were five grounds for divorce in . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . not support a divorce on the grounds of infertility. Jesus . . .
Chap.4 Sect.1 Para.3. . . say anything about the other grounds for divorce - neglect . . .
Chap.4 Sect.2 Para.1. . . , did allude to these three grounds when he reminded the . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.1. . . to the other biblical grounds for divorce (neglect . . .
Chap.5 Sect.1 Para.4. . . be traced back to the grounds for divorce in Ex.21.1 . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . was there any need to cite grounds for a divorce, just as . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2 Para.1. . . as there is no need to cite grounds in most modern . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.1. . . countries, and teach specific grounds for divorce?/Before 19 . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.2. . . a divorce for adultery. New grounds or 'offences' such as . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.3. . . been away from specific grounds for divorce and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.1 Para.4. . . taught a practical set of grounds for divorce./ . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.1. . . teach the Old Testament grounds for divorce - . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.2. . . study)?/The 'traditional' grounds (adultery and . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.3. . . should teach all the biblical grounds for divorce. These can . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.3. . . teach that marriage vows form grounds for divorce if they . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.3. . . and love', so they had valid grounds for divorce. But . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.5. . . divorce without valid grounds is wrong, it still . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.5. . . who divorced without valid grounds should repent before . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.1. . . divorce on the biblical grounds of unfaithfulness, . . .
Chap.5 Sect.3 Para.3. . . as impractical./The biblical grounds for divorce have been . . .

Group
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.5. . . make sense, however, if a group of Jews existed which . . .
Chap.1 Sect.4 Para.5. . . that they had found such a group. However, the texts . . .
Chap.2 Sect.7 Para.2. . . the same context, to the same group of people. It is likely . . .

Groups
Chap.2 Sect.1 Para.2. . . refer to a debate between two groups of Pharisees in the . . .

Guilt
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.2. . . to establish innocence and guilt. In my experience this . . .

Guilty
Chap.5 Sect.2.2 Para.2. . . within marriages or feeling guilty when they are divorced. . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.3 Para.4. . . mentally commits adultery is guilty of actual adultery. . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.4 Para.4. . . even innocent divorcees into guilty sinners. Therefore the . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.1. . . church allow remarriage of 'guilty' divorcees and those . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.1. . . church allow remarriage of 'guilty' divorcees and those . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.2. . . divorces?/Remarrying a 'guilty' divorcee might imply . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.2. . . divorces?/Remarrying a 'guilty' divorcee might imply . . .
Chap.5 Sect.2.5 Para.3. . . a divorcee is innocent or guilty and no-one has ever . . .